Kids + Money, Emoticons - Review

Okay, I'm making up for lost time here. It's like an episode of Star Trek where the past will keep moving faster and faster until it finally meets with the present. And eventually I'll be writing about films before I've even watched them. And then the fabric of space and time will wrinkle and we'll have to send Data into the resulting wormhole. God's speed you lovable android!

That's not going to segue into the docs I'm talking about so.... here's some reviews!

---

Kids + Money
(USA, Directed by Lauren Greenfield)

This short film screened before Emoticons on an "all about teenagers" double bill. Much like its succinct title, it focuses mainly on wealthy 12 to 16 year olds in LA, and the way they spend their parent's money. This is a very rich (oh the puns!) and fertile ground for a documentary film. It strikes a definite chord with the audience, especially when you consider the average doc watcher is probably a working class hipster or socially conscious hippie. There is something wonderfully scandalous about a twelve year old owning a $3,000 book bag, and I think the audience really enjoyed their righteous indignation. The sheer materialistic lust exhibited by these rich young things would make Paris Hilton blush. Perhaps appearances have always meant the most to us during our teenage years, but Kids + Money gives us a peek at a much grander level of decadence and greed.

To counterbalance the rich kids, the film also profiles kids from middle class and economically depressed families. These kids are working to help their families survive, but they are not immune to the allure of wealth. In the interviews with one teenage boy in particular, sitting in the back yard of his run down apartment, the film says something almost profound. Here is a boy who is smart and driven, but focused almost entirely of maintaining an image of wealth. He lives a lie, and his envy of the truly wealthy taints everything he does. He would like to stop caring but says that "money really does make the world go round". There is an undeniable truth to that statement. It's easy to criticize kids for being materialistic, shallow, and easily influenced, but they are only following society's lead. Our whole economy is based on consumption and teenagers were practically invented by retailers.

Kids + Money was very enjoyable and quite thought provoking. I appreciated the simple visual style of the interviews and the tight editing. Director Lauren Greenfield let her subjects speak for themselves without interjecting her own views of consumer culture. It's up to us to change our values and the role money has in our children's lives. It's a simple message, but one that's easily forgotten. 4.5 out of 5

---

Emoticons
(Netherlands, Directed by Heddy Honigmann)

Emoticons is an hour long film that takes a look at how isolated teenage girls use the Internet. Social networking sites link girls who are bullied, misunderstood, depressed or ignored, so that they can communicate with each other. They play online games, chat, and use web cams to keep tabs on each other's lives. Some of the girls find real friends who give them the support they may lack at home or school. Others use the internet for autonomous advice and entertainment. In all cases, the internet provides an escape from difficult and sometimes painful reality.

Director Heddy Honigmann uses web cams to conduct her interviews, and this is my first criticism of the film. Not only is watching people on a computer visually boring, there is something almost creepy about Honigmann, a grown woman always partially in shadow, using chat rooms to coax her young subjects into telling us why they're lonely. The director has no malicious intent, but nonetheless it play a little close to the description of the internet predator we keep telling kids to beware. What if the director had been a man? Is it okay for teenagers to chat with each other but not, necessarily, to adults (or perhaps it is the absence of adults that sends teens to the internet in the first place)? To be fair, Honigmann also uses traditional in person interview techniques with her subjects, often giving us insight into the teen's social and family situations. In these segments, however, the cinematography remains flat and uninteresting.

The subjects of the film are varied in their particular situations but they share hardships any teenager could recognize. The desire for acceptance while feeling alienated and awkward are universal teenage experiences. The fact that now teens connect over the internet is a valid point, but not very surprising. I don't want to give the impression that I did not relate to some of these kids, or that I was insensitive to their problems. I was just too aware of what I was supposed to feel, with the film giving emotional cues as obvious as a tearful email and slow motion hug. Also, some subjects were forced through to not very satisfying conclusions, while other teens were dropped from the narrative without reason. In the end Emoticons felt as distant to me as, well, an internet chat room. 2.5 out of 5